GEO Comparisons
GEO agencies & tools
for B2B SaaS, compared.
Buyers compare GEO vendors before they ever call sales. Here's the honest landscape: who runs the work, who only measures it, and how to choose between them.
Comparisons · Updated
Free 30-minute call. A working conversation, not a pitch.
The B2B SaaS GEO market splits in two. On one side are agencies that run the work: Resonate Labs, First Page Sage, Omniscient Digital, Graphite, GenOptima, and Genevate. On the other are tools that measure it: Profound, Peec AI, Scrunch, and Evertune. So the honest first question isn't "which vendor," it's whether you need a team to run GEO or software to track it. Resonate Labs runs it.
The split
GEO vendors divide into agencies that execute the work and tools that measure it. Most buyers are really choosing between those two jobs first.
The honest question
Before "which vendor," decide whether you need someone to run GEO for you, or a dashboard to track how you're doing.
Where Resonate fits
Resonate Labs is a managed service whose execution system includes measurement, so it runs the work and reports on it in one engagement.
Agencies run GEO. Tools measure it.
The cleanest way to read this market is by what each vendor actually does. The four tools (Profound, Peec AI, Scrunch, and Evertune) track how AI engines describe you: how often you're mentioned, where you rank in an answer, which sources get cited. They report it on a dashboard, and the best of them suggest what to work on. They do not write the content, build the schema, or ship the technical fixes. Even Profound's "actions" stop at content briefs, not published content.
The six agencies (Resonate Labs, First Page Sage, Omniscient Digital, Graphite, GenOptima, and Genevate) do that downstream work: the content, structure, and citations that change what the engines say. The honest implication is that a tool is enough if you already have an in-house team with the capacity and GEO expertise to act on the data. If you need the work run and shipped, that's an agency's job. And several of these "agencies" are really SEO and content shops that added a GEO label, which the next sections help you tell apart.
The B2B SaaS GEO landscape, compared
The table below compares the vendors on verifiable structural facts: what kind of provider each is, whether it executes or only measures, whether it publishes pricing, and where its GEO practice came from. It deliberately leaves out self-reported performance numbers, which nearly every vendor in this category publishes and none has independently audited. Figures are current as of June 2026.
| Vendor | Type | Role | Content production | Public pricing | GEO origin | Track record / scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resonate Labs | Agency + tooling | Executes | Yes (DWY / DFY) | Public, from $5k/mo | GEO-native | Emerging; founder-authored Cited; methodology built in-house |
| First Page Sage | Agency | Executes | Yes | Public, $2–12k/mo | SEO + PR | Est. 2009; high-volume publisher |
| Omniscient Digital | Agency | Executes | Yes | Public, from $10k/mo | SEO / content extension | Est. 2019; ex-HubSpot / Shopify founders |
| Graphite | Agency + tooling | Executes | Yes | Not public | SEO-native ("AEO") | MasterClass, Notion, Webflow clients |
| GenOptima | Agency | Executes | Yes | Not public; performance-based | GEO; China-engine focus | New (2025); China + Singapore |
| Genevate | Agency | Executes | Yes (PR-led) | Not public | GEO + PR | New (2026); founder-led |
| Profound | Tool | Measures (+ briefs) | No | Partial, from ~$499/mo | — | ~$1B valuation; 700+ enterprise customers |
| Peec AI | Tool | Measures | No | Public, from ~$95/mo | — | $21M Series A; Berlin |
| Scrunch | Tool | Measures (+ edge) | No | Public, from ~$250/mo | — | Now part of Sitecore (2026) |
| Evertune | Tool | Measures | No | Not public; ~$3k/mo est. | — | $15M Series A; ex-Trade Desk founders |
Scroll the table sideways on a narrow screen.
The agencies
First Page Sage is best for teams that want a category-senior agency publishing a high volume of thought-leadership content. Its GEO method is built on SEO and PR, and its published ROI figures are self-reported.
Omniscient Digital is best for B2B SaaS teams that want revenue-framed content execution from a team with in-house operator pedigree. Its GEO offering is one part of a broader organic-growth practice.
Graphite is best for content-heavy SaaS brands that want authority content at scale from a category-leading AEO practitioner with a recognizable client roster. It brands the work "AEO" and covers the topic landscape; its pricing isn't public.
GenOptima is best for brands that prioritize visibility in Chinese AI engines, or that prefer a pay-when-cited pricing structure. The result it prices on is citations rather than pipeline, and its published terms don't guarantee specific outcomes.
Genevate is best for brands that want GEO paired with PR and earned-media authority work. It's a newer, founder-led firm, and technical GEO isn't part of its public offering.
The tools
Profound is best for enterprise teams that want the most comprehensive AI-visibility measurement and have the capacity to act on it. It measures and produces content briefs; it doesn't write or ship the content.
Peec AI is best for teams that want affordable, fast, multi-engine visibility tracking and have in-house capacity to execute. It's a tracking tool, not an execution partner.
Scrunch is best for technical teams that want AI-visibility monitoring alongside edge-level crawler optimization. As of June 2026 it's part of Sitecore. It surfaces the work but doesn't produce the content.
Evertune is best for enterprise brand and marketing teams that want model-level AI brand analytics at scale. Like the other tools, it measures rather than remediates.
How to choose: the questions that matter
The right choice comes down to a few honest questions, not a feature checklist.
Execute or measure? Decide first whether you need the work done or only the score. A tool reports where you stand; an agency changes it. Buying a tool when you have no one to act on it produces dashboards, not results.
GEO-native, or SEO relabeled? Ask whether the methodology was built for how AI engines assemble answers, or is an existing SEO and content-and-PR playbook with a new name. A genuine GEO practice measures actual model recommendations and optimizes for inclusion in the synthesized answer; a relabeled one mostly produces more content and hopes.
Which engines does it cover? Confirm the vendor actually works across the engines your buyers use (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity), rather than optimizing for or tracking a single one.
Self-reported or verifiable? Almost every published result in this category is self-reported, with no independent audit and often no disclosed sample size. Ask what is independently checkable before you weigh a headline number.
Transparent pricing and a locked query set? Clear pricing and a set of tracked queries agreed with you up front protect you from moving goalposts, especially with performance-priced models, where the vendor decides what counts as a win.
To put these questions to work, the GEO vendor RFP and scorecard turns them into a template, a weighted grading sheet, and a vetting checklist you can run.
Where Resonate Labs fits
Resonate Labs is best for B2B SaaS teams that need GEO run and shipped, not just measured: teams without an in-house GEO function who want one engagement to cover the audit, the plan, and the execution. It's not the right fit if you only need a visibility dashboard, where a tool is the cheaper buy, or if you already have a fully-staffed in-house GEO team that just needs data to act on.
Resonate Labs is a tech-enabled service: an agency that runs on its own proprietary tooling rather than manual work alone. That's the difference from a pure agency. Its execution system includes the measurement a standalone tool would give you, so the same engagement that runs the work also reports on it, and there's no separate dashboard to buy. Resonate is GEO-native, built for how AI engines assemble answers rather than adapted from an SEO playbook.
It runs in two models. Done-with-you: Resonate builds the knowledge graph and query set, runs the monthly AI visibility audit, and hands your team a 30-day action plan to ship against, with support in Slack. Done-for-you: Resonate writes and publishes the content and owns the visibility score. Both open with a Foundation Review and a first audit, so you see where you stand before committing to the work. Pricing starts at $5,000/month and is laid out on the homepage.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between a GEO agency and a GEO tool?
A GEO tool measures your visibility in AI answers (how often you're mentioned, where you rank, which sources get cited) and reports it on a dashboard. A GEO agency does the work that changes those numbers: the content, structure, and technical fixes that earn citations. Tools like Profound, Peec AI, Scrunch, and Evertune tell you where you stand; agencies like Resonate Labs, First Page Sage, and Omniscient Digital move it. Some teams need only the data; most need the execution.
How do I tell a real GEO agency from an SEO shop that rebranded?
Ask how the methodology accounts for the way AI engines assemble answers, not just how pages rank in Google. A genuine GEO practice measures actual model recommendations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and optimizes for inclusion in the synthesized answer; a rebranded SEO offering tends to describe GEO as its existing content-and-PR playbook with a new label. Ask which engines they track, how they measure visibility, and whether their results are independently verifiable or self-reported.
Do I need a GEO tool if I hire an agency?
Usually not. A managed GEO service that includes its own measurement covers the tracking a standalone tool would give you, so you're not paying twice. The exception is if your team has already standardized on a specific tool and wants the agency to work from it. Resonate Labs, for example, includes measurement in the engagement rather than requiring a separate tool subscription.
How should I evaluate GEO vendors before signing?
Work through a short list of questions: Does the vendor execute the work or only measure and advise? Is the methodology built for AI answers, or an SEO playbook relabeled? Which engines does it actually cover? Are its results independently verifiable or self-reported? Is pricing transparent, and is the set of tracked queries agreed with you up front? The answers separate a real GEO partner from a vanity report.
Next step
See where AI puts you against the field.
A free GEO Snapshot maps your category and shows where you stand against the vendors buyers are comparing you to.
- Which queries your buyers actually ask AI
- Where you're visible, cited, or absent today
- What the first 30 days would move